Mapped to the Draftiro controls that satisfy each one. Updated as new opinions land.
Last updated: 2026-05-29
Confidentiality, competence, supervision, communication, and reasonable fees when using generative AI.
Every AI exchange auto-creates a billable time entry flagged "AI-assisted" so the disclosure to clients is auditable; engagement-letter template includes the required AI-use clause.
Lawyer must understand the technology, protect confidentiality, supervise output, and bill ethically.
CourtListener-validated citations, no-train pledge with Gemini, audit log + AAL2 step-up for sensitive surfaces.
Mandatory human review of AI work product; emphasis on competence, supervision, and disclosure to clients.
Citation validation flags verified / missing / unchecked; AI disclaimer appended to every assistant message.
Lawyers must obtain informed consent before inputting confidential client information into a generative AI tool that "learns" from inputs.
Gemini API tier explicitly does NOT train on inputs; consent is documented in the engagement letter template Draftiro ships.
Lawyers must maintain technological competence and supervise AI output.
In-product disclaimers + audit-loggable review trail; citation validation reduces hallucination risk.
Reasonable diligence required when using generative AI — verify outputs before relying on them.
Citation validation surfaces unverified or missing sources visibly in the chat.
We use essential cookies to keep you signed in and privacy-friendly, cookieless analytics to improve Draftiro. No third-party advertising trackers.